Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Security Council trying again for first COVID-19 resolution

Must Read

AP Explains: Bolsonaro has downplayed virus fears for months

SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for months flirted with the brand new coronavirus as he flouted...

Trump’s decision to withdraw from the WHO couldn’t come at a worse time

Consistent with the President’s basic disdain for worldwide cooperation, the Trump administration is formally withdrawing the U.S. from the...

WHO points to alarming coronavirus evidence ’emerging’

The World Health Organization has acknowledged there may be “evidence emerging” of the airborne unfold of the coronavirus, after...

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. Security Council is trying again to succeed in settlement on its first resolution on COVID-19 because the coronavirus began circling the worldwide in February, after a prolonged dispute between the U.S. and China over mentioning the World Health Organization.

A revised draft resolution by France and China was submitted for a vote Tuesday and the result’s anticipated to be introduced on Wednesday.

The draft resolution backs Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ March 23 name for international cease-fires to deal with the pandemic, and calls for an “immediate cessation of hostilities” in all conflicts on its agenda together with Syria, Yemen, Libya, South Sudan and Congo.

It calls on all combatants “to engage immediately in a durable humanitarian pause for at least 90 consecutive days” to allow the secure and unhindered supply of humanitarian assist and medical evacuations.

The draft resolution states that these measures don’t apply to navy operations in opposition to the Islamic State and al-Qaida extremist teams and their associates.

Guterres informed a press convention final Thursday that his attraction for a worldwide ceasefire has been endorsed by practically 180 nations, greater than 20 armed teams, spiritual leaders and thousands and thousands of members of civil society.

“The difficulty is to implement it,” he mentioned.

,The secretary-general mentioned he and U.N. envoys are working collectively “to establish effective cease-fires and doing everything possible to overcome the legacy of long-lasting conflicts with deep mistrust among the parties and spoilers with a vested interest in disruption.”

Repeated makes an attempt to undertake a Security Council resolution have been stymied over a reference to the World Health Organization.

President Donald Trump suspended funding to WHO in early April, accusing the U.N. well being company of failing to cease the virus from spreading when it first surfaced in China. He mentioned it “must be held accountable,” and accused WHO of parroting Beijing.

China strongly helps WHO and insisted that its position in calling for international motion on COVID-19 be included in any resolution, diplomats mentioned, whereas the U.S. insisted on a reference to “transparency” on COVID-19 and no point out of the WHO.

The draft being put to a vote doesn’t point out both the WHO, a U.N. well being company, or transparency.

But it does be aware of a resolution adopted April 2 by the 193-member U.N. General Assembly which “calls for intensified international cooperation to contain, mitigate and defeat the pandemic, including by exchanging information, scientific knowledge and best practices and by applying the relevant guidelines recommended by the World Health Organization.”

That resolution acknowledges “the unprecedented effects” of the pandemic and calls for “intensified international cooperation to contain, mitigate and defeat” the brand new coronavirus.

The General Assembly adopted one other resolution on April 20 urging international motion to quickly scale up growth, manufacturing and entry to medication, vaccines and medical gear to confront the pandemic.

While General Assembly resolutions mirror the opinion of governments all over the world, they don’t seem to be legally binding. By distinction, Security Council resolutions are legally binding.

U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric mentioned Monday {that a} council resolution is essential.

“The Security Council has primacy in the U.N. over issues of peace and security,” he mentioned. “A strong unified statement from that body supporting the secretary general’s call for a global cease-fire, I think, would go a long way in, hopefully, making a call for a cease-fire a reality.”



Source by [author_name]

World Corona Virus Cases Update

11,939,593 Total
545,588 (4.6%) Deaths
6,842,510 (57.3%) Recovered
08 Jul 2020, 12:10 PM (GMT)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

AP Explains: Bolsonaro has downplayed virus fears for months

SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for months flirted with the brand new coronavirus as he flouted...

Trump’s decision to withdraw from the WHO couldn’t come at a worse time

Consistent with the President’s basic disdain for worldwide cooperation, the Trump administration is formally withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization. Critics of...

WHO points to alarming coronavirus evidence ’emerging’

The World Health Organization has acknowledged there may be “evidence emerging” of the airborne unfold of the coronavirus, after a bunch of scientists urged...

Toronto FC opener pushed back as MLS deals with mounting return issues

The MLS is Back event is slated to be held at Walt Disney World.Perhaps it ought to be held at Fantasyland.More and extra, the...

Trump Administration Officially Begins United States’ Withdrawal From World Health Organization

The Trump administration is pulling the United States out of the World Health Organization, because the nation faces record-breaking spikes in coronavirus instances.A state division...

World Corona Virus Cases Update

11,939,593 Total
545,588 (4.6%) Deaths
6,842,510 (57.3%) Recovered
08 Jul 2020, 12:10 PM (GMT)

More News Like This